Non compliance in doing homework assignments between group therapy Dissertation

Non compliance in doing homework assignments mingled with base therapy sessions for substance ab role and depression - Dissertation ExampleRies et al. (2009, p.762) state that patients with substance abuse who comply with the chemical convention therapy sessions and complete their homework assignments experience positive discourse gists and thus be less likely to surrender out of the treatment. They state that integrated supportive group therapy in a randomized trial has shown a differential effect on treatment retention in subjects with severe mental disorders and substance use disorders, and homework compliance is the adherence that comes as one positive outcome of group therapy sessions for such patients. Reinecke (2010, p.54) maintains the theme that clients with depression are less likely to adhere with the in-session motion-picture show which makes them non-comply with homework completion. He states that the cause for this is that the in-session exposure of a depressi ve client or one suffering from anxiety involves others observing him doing homework, which he is already offensive about, thus enhancing his anxiety into social anxiety disorder. However, Reinecke affirms that homework compliance is an important bridge between the in-session activities and depart of clients attitude toward life, especially for patients with depression, anxiety and substance abuse. He suggests that the clients demeanor of homework non-compliance should be addressed very early in the therapy. Cruess et al. (2010) found that the patients reported that they non-comply with the between-session homework because of omit of receptivity to details regarding their medical illness. lien et al. (2010) study in their research the relationship between the substance abuse group therapy sessions and patient compliance. They found that what motivates the patients to comply with the completion of between-session homework is the clinical outcome which they want to see as their health benefits. According to them, patients balance expected benefits and costs during a treatment episode when deciding on compliance and hence comply with the standards if they seem to be benefitting from the treatment since the Lien et al. observed that those patients who were progressing were less likely to not complete homework, not show at or cat out of the sessions. Similar conclusions have been approached by Guardiano, Weinstock and Miller (2011) who have found that patients of substance abuse are at high risk of non-compliance with homework completion or attendance at group therapy sessions imputable to which they have to suffer from negative consequences. They have proposed an adjunctive psychosocial intervention that will reduce noncompliance in substance abusers. According to them, The intervention involves brief in-person sessions and follow-up phone contacts with the patient and a probatory other/family member. They state that this intervention will improve the effe cts of group therapy on substance abusers by helping enhance the relationship between them and the provider thus motivating them to attend the group therapy sessions dapple adhering to the homework completion. Abramowitz et al. (2009, p.104) have suggested that patients can be motivated to comply with homework completion in group therapy sessions by encouraging self-controlled exposure so that patients are motivated to perform more exposure exercises. Mausbach et al. (2010) studied relationship between depressive clients homework compliance and group therapy outcomes and found