Confidence Interval and Reflective Writing Tips

contemplative Writing Tips Reflective writing is where you revisit experiences and write down your thoughts close them, asking questions such as What did I nonice? Why did it come across this charge? How was I changed by this? What might I be possessed of do differently? How could I confine handled the situation differently in hindsight? What have I learnt about myself? How do I interact in a aggroup? How did I feel? Why did I react the manner I did? How finish I break for next time? You will consume to do a lot of research, There is a indi sightt list provided as a starting organise. Do you follow each of the theories? Have you got experiences now that show the theories atomic number 18 true? You do not need to be analyzing other team members actions. This is not a assemblage to blame everyone else You should be looking inwards at yourself for answers and looking at your own reactions to the situations and how you could improve and grow. This is not a report so you dont need to follow report format. You can lay it out however you necessitate to.It should mainly be about what you have learnt in PASBD but you could supplement in some individualal experience if you wish. You will need puritanical SHU Harvard referencing and a bibliography. Leaflet attached. Dont be too descriptive about the concomitant of what happened, it is more than about your analysis of why the things happened that did. Finally I have two examples from people who have done this assignment previously, one rubber and one very good. Bad Example approx 40% As a final year student, the reflection on team building or team operative is difficult when you dont enjoy the people you are working with.The world-class adjudicate is to communicate in various forms of communications which are needed to arrange times to take and possibly exchange feeling details at this stage so you know who, where and what a person looks equivalent when its time to meet. Perso nally when the first group was formed, the initial test was to email group members to arrange possible times to meet, however I was lucky enough to have two members within my group to which I have worked with before throughout my course, therefore there was a strengthened relationship already which made work carried out easier.This meant I know the capability, thrive and enthusiasm of those individuals to carry out given task, although one of them can be a bit bossy, on the other hand it was more difficult to predict what the other members would be like, as for not cunning who they are and what kind of a person they are this bought my confidence levels down. When confront with a situation such as meeting people for the first time, it is always good to start off on the right foot. In my own personal experience the best thing to do was to meet the group and get to know the members and see what they are like.In damage of confidence, it was certain that they all had similar thoughts g oing through their minds to what an individual like myself or others would bring to the team. When we started the first case which was Atkinsons the two knock-down(prenominal)er members led the way and the rest of us were quite happy to let them take authority. We decided that we shouldnt move to Meadowhall which turned out to be the right choice. The national assumption exercise didnt turn out as well as we didnt think about who we were presenting to. I wasnt happy about the mark for this. steady-going Example approx 90% When considering what part I might play, I considered what team role I would suit from Belbins (1981) psychological profiles of how people behave, contribute and have-to doe with with others. Due to my confident and influential personality my perception would have primitively been that of the alpha female. To initiate thoughts, make executive decisions and organise the group towards the give the sack goal. Looking at the team roles outlined, I would have classed myself as a co-ordinator Mature, confident, a good chairperson clarifies goals, promotes decision-making, delegates well. This summary reflects how I would try to control the group work to what I want to achieve. Being a of course confident person I felt that I would be fitted to exert influence on people to achieve what I cherished by allowing my behavior to be controlled by my internal personality (Bateman and Crate, 1993). As tasks began, I found it difficult to let go when tasks were divided and I essay to micro-manage. This lack of trust in other peoples work meant that I tack additional pressure and workload on myself.In order to improve my actions (and stress levels) I have to better understand my locus of control (Rotter 1966) whether the item is within(internal) or beyond(external) my personal control. I have come to learn that sweet is not everything and too great a focus on it can block learning. Problems came to head when my considered personal strength w as mixed with another strong character, I felt like I had to fight to get my point across. I felt beaten by constant, critical comment as she would often counteract my ideas or discard them.However, we found that our debates achieved an effective isotropy and we produced a high quality presentation by using rehabilitative criticism. I realise now that she was not aiming to target or discredit my ideas or work but she was just trying to achieve a better result by challenging my suggestions. I have learnt that in future I should value all criticisms as they can evoke my performance. Finally Its all about the journey and not the destination. Focus on the process and learning with an internal emphasis. Its not about whether you got the tasks right or wrong but about what you learned about yourself and life whilst doing them.